Compares pros/cons of virtual vs. in-person therapy.

The landscape of mental health care has changed dramatically in recent years, especially with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. One of the most notable shifts has been the rise of online therapy, allowing individuals to connect with therapists through platforms like Zoom. This digital approach offers convenience, accessibility, and flexibility, transforming therapy from a traditionally in-person experience to one that can be conducted entirely online.

However, as with any change, this new method of therapy raises important questions. Is online therapy as effective as face-to-face therapy? Is there something about the in-person experience that Zoom-based therapy cannot replicate? In this article, we will explore the various aspects of both in-person and online therapy, assessing the benefits, drawbacks, and nuances of each approach. Ultimately, this will allow individuals to make a more informed decision on which therapy format may be better suited to their needs.

The Evolution of Therapy

Traditional In-Person Therapy

For most of the 20th century, therapy has been conducted exclusively in-person. From the early psychoanalytic sessions of Freud to the humanistic therapies of Carl Rogers, therapy has always been centered on face-to-face, interpersonal interaction. The physical presence of the therapist and the client in the same space has been seen as essential for building trust and rapport. The non-verbal cues—body language, facial expressions, gestures—have played a critical role in understanding the client’s emotional state. Therapists have relied on these cues to detect subtle shifts in a client’s mood or even uncover feelings that clients may not verbalize.

Emergence of Online Therapy

The advent of the internet and advancements in digital communication have paved the way for online therapy, which was first popularized in the early 2000s. Initially, this involved text-based platforms, where clients would communicate with therapists asynchronously. However, the COVID-19 pandemic pushed this technology into the mainstream, with video-based platforms like Zoom and Skype rapidly becoming the norm. The ability to provide therapy remotely via video conferencing has revolutionized access to mental health care, making it more convenient and widespread.

Although in-person therapy still holds a significant place in the field, teletherapy has become a viable and often preferable alternative for many individuals. But does it offer the same benefits as traditional face-to-face therapy? What are the strengths and weaknesses of each format?

The Benefits of In-Person Therapy

Personal Connection and Building Trust

One of the most significant benefits of in-person therapy is the ability to form a personal connection. Humans are social creatures, and face-to-face interactions are deeply ingrained in our communication methods. In-person therapy allows for a richer, more immediate exchange. Therapists can observe body language, facial expressions, and other non-verbal cues that provide insight into a client’s emotional state. These subtle cues often offer additional layers of information that cannot be captured in a virtual session.

The physical presence of the therapist also helps to build trust and intimacy. It creates a safe, shared space for clients to open up about personal issues. The therapist’s office becomes a sanctuary where clients feel free to express themselves without judgment. For many, this physical presence makes it easier to feel heard and understood.

Fewer Distractions

In-person therapy typically takes place in a quiet, controlled environment, which helps reduce distractions. Clients can step into the therapist’s office, where the sole focus is on their mental well-being. There are fewer external interruptions like Wi-Fi connectivity issues, background noise, or technology glitches—common challenges in virtual therapy.

This singular focus can be critical for clients who need to escape the distractions of daily life. Many individuals struggling with mental health issues, such as anxiety or trauma, find that in-person therapy helps them focus solely on their emotional well-being.

Immediate Emotional Feedback

When in the same room, therapists can provide more immediate emotional feedback to clients. A comforting touch on the shoulder, a reassuring nod, or an empathetic gaze can make a world of difference in helping clients feel understood. The presence of a therapist in the same physical space creates an emotional and energetic connection that is harder to replicate in virtual settings.

For some types of therapy, such as trauma therapy or somatic experiencing, the physical presence of the therapist is even more critical. These approaches rely on a therapist’s ability to observe bodily responses, such as tension, changes in posture, or physical discomfort, and work through those responses in real-time.

Physical Presence for Emotional Safety

Being physically present can create a stronger sense of safety, particularly for clients dealing with trauma, deep emotional pain, or anxiety. The proximity of the therapist can act as an anchor, reassuring the client that help is within reach. Some individuals feel more secure in a physical space where they can engage in both verbal and non-verbal communication without the fear of technical issues or disconnection.

The Benefits of Zoom Therapy

Convenience and Flexibility

One of the most obvious advantages of Zoom therapy is its unparalleled convenience. Clients no longer need to travel to a therapist’s office, which can be especially beneficial for those with busy schedules or those living in remote areas. Online therapy eliminates the need for commuting, saving time, reducing stress, and potentially allowing for more frequent sessions.

In addition, Zoom therapy offers greater flexibility in scheduling. Many therapists offer evening or weekend appointments to accommodate clients’ schedules, and the ability to attend a session from home or any quiet, private space can make therapy more accessible.

Accessibility for People in Remote Areas

For individuals living in rural areas, small towns, or places with limited access to mental health professionals, Zoom therapy opens doors that might otherwise be closed. Clients can find and work with therapists from anywhere in the world, increasing the chances of finding a therapist with the right specialization, approach, and experience.

For people with mobility issues, physical disabilities, or those who feel uncomfortable traveling due to mental health conditions (like social anxiety), Zoom therapy makes therapy much more accessible.

Comfort and Familiarity of Home

Another important benefit of Zoom therapy is the comfort of being in one’s own home. For clients who experience social anxiety or discomfort in new, unfamiliar settings, the virtual space offers a degree of control. They are in an environment where they feel safe, secure, and in control. This can foster a sense of comfort that might not be possible in a traditional office setting, especially for clients who are reluctant to leave their home due to mental health challenges.

The ease of attending therapy from home can help reduce the stress that may arise from traveling, navigating an unfamiliar building, or waiting in a public space before the session begins.

Reduced Costs

For both clients and therapists, Zoom therapy can reduce costs. For clients, there are no transportation costs, and therapy sessions are often less expensive due to the lack of overhead costs associated with maintaining a physical office. This can make therapy more affordable and accessible, especially for individuals who may not have insurance or who are on tight budgets.

For therapists, Zoom therapy removes the need for maintaining office space, which can be a significant financial burden. This can allow therapists to pass on the savings to their clients, creating a more cost-effective therapy option.

Potential Challenges of In-Person Therapy

Limited Accessibility

Despite the many advantages of in-person therapy, it is not accessible to everyone. For individuals living in rural or remote areas, finding a qualified therapist nearby can be a challenge. Additionally, those with mobility issues, transportation difficulties, or limited financial resources may struggle with the logistics of attending in-person therapy.

For those who experience anxiety or other mental health challenges, the prospect of traveling to a therapist’s office can feel overwhelming. For many people, the requirement to physically leave their home to seek help may create additional barriers.

Time Constraints

In-person therapy is typically scheduled during traditional office hours, and appointments may be limited in evenings or on weekends. This can create scheduling conflicts for individuals who work full-time or have family obligations. Additionally, the time required for travel to and from the therapist’s office adds extra hours to what might already be a packed schedule.

This time commitment may discourage some individuals from attending therapy regularly, potentially hindering progress or disrupting treatment.

Scheduling Difficulties

Another potential downside of in-person therapy is the difficulty some clients face in finding a therapist who aligns with their needs and schedule. Therapists often have limited availability, and popular times like evenings or weekends may be booked weeks in advance. This can make it harder to secure a regular time slot that works with the client’s schedule.

Potential Challenges of Zoom Therapy

Technology Issues

One of the most significant challenges of Zoom therapy is the reliance on technology. Clients and therapists need access to high-speed internet, functioning cameras, microphones, and compatible software. Even minor technical issues—such as poor video quality, sound glitches, or Wi-Fi connection problems—can disrupt the therapeutic process.

For clients who are not tech-savvy, these technical challenges can be frustrating and can create barriers to accessing care. Additionally, technical issues can distract both the client and the therapist, leading to a less productive session.

Impersonal Nature of Virtual Sessions

While Zoom therapy offers many advantages, some clients report feeling less connected to their therapist compared to in-person sessions. Without the physical presence of the therapist, it can sometimes feel more difficult to establish an emotional bond. Non-verbal communication, such as body language and eye contact, is harder to interpret through a screen, which can make it more challenging for the therapist to read the client’s emotional state.

In addition, distractions in the client’s environment—such as family members, pets, or noisy neighbors—can interfere with the session and make it more difficult for the client to stay present and engaged.

Privacy Concerns

While Zoom therapy is generally secure, some clients may feel concerned about their privacy during virtual sessions. The fear of hacking or data breaches, even with encrypted platforms, can create anxiety for individuals who already feel vulnerable discussing personal issues. Additionally, if a client does not have a private space at home, they may worry about someone overhearing their conversation.

The rise of virtual therapy has brought numerous advantages, such as convenience, accessibility, and flexibility. However, it has also introduced several privacy concerns, which can significantly impact the therapeutic process and client well-being. Ensuring confidentiality in virtual therapy is critical, as clients often share deeply personal and sensitive information with their therapists. Below, we explore some of the primary privacy concerns associated with virtual therapy.

Data Security and Encryption

One of the most pressing concerns for clients engaging in virtual therapy is the security of their personal data. Online therapy platforms, like Zoom, utilize encryption protocols to protect video and audio data during sessions. However, encryption does not guarantee complete security. Hackers or malicious third parties may still find ways to intercept and access personal data if the platform’s security measures are insufficient or flawed.

For instance, a recent study showed that certain video conferencing platforms had vulnerabilities that could potentially allow unauthorized individuals to access private sessions. While many therapy platforms claim to use end-to-end encryption, this security measure is only effective if implemented correctly. If a platform’s encryption is compromised, sensitive conversations and personal health information may be at risk of exposure.

Platform Privacy Policies

The privacy policies of virtual therapy platforms play a crucial role in determining the level of data protection offered to clients. Some platforms may store session data, which could include video recordings, chat logs, or client feedback. If this data is not adequately protected, it may be vulnerable to data breaches or unauthorized access by the company itself or third parties. Clients should carefully read privacy policies to understand how their data will be used, whether it is shared with third parties, and how long the data will be stored.

Moreover, many therapy platforms collect additional data, such as IP addresses, device information, and geographical locations. While this data is often used for administrative purposes, it can also pose a risk if mishandled. A lack of transparency regarding data storage and sharing practices can lead to distrust among clients, particularly those already concerned about their privacy.

Technical Vulnerabilities

Despite advancements in technology, virtual therapy still relies on internet infrastructure, which is susceptible to technical issues and security vulnerabilities. Issues such as poor encryption, malware, or spyware on personal devices can compromise the confidentiality of a session. If a client uses an insecure internet connection, such as public Wi-Fi, there is a heightened risk of data being intercepted. Similarly, outdated devices or software can make it easier for cybercriminals to exploit system vulnerabilities.

Additionally, if the therapist’s or client’s device is compromised by malware, it could result in the unauthorized access or recording of private sessions. This underscores the importance of both therapists and clients maintaining up-to-date security protocols, including firewalls, anti-malware software, and secure internet connections.

Insecure Environments

One of the primary differences between virtual and in-person therapy is the environment in which it occurs. In traditional therapy, clients are in a private, controlled setting, such as a therapist’s office. However, with virtual therapy, there are risks associated with both the client’s and therapist’s physical environments. If a client is in a shared space, there is a risk that someone nearby could overhear sensitive conversations. In a home setting, family members, roommates, or even neighbors might unintentionally breach confidentiality, which could lead to embarrassment or discomfort.

Similarly, therapists conducting virtual sessions from their homes may inadvertently expose clients to privacy risks. If the therapist’s home office is not properly secured, others in their household could overhear or access confidential information. Virtual therapy platforms generally provide guidelines for maintaining a secure environment, but ultimately, the responsibility lies with both the therapist and the client to ensure their physical spaces are safe for confidential communication.

Legal and Regulatory Concerns

Virtual therapy raises questions about legal and regulatory frameworks related to privacy. While traditional in-person therapy is governed by established regulations such as HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) in the U.S., virtual therapy platforms often operate across different jurisdictions, which may have varying privacy laws. This can create uncertainty about how client data is protected, especially if the platform is hosted in a different country with less stringent privacy regulations.

For example, some online therapy platforms might store data in countries where privacy laws do not offer the same level of protection as those in the client’s home country. This international aspect of virtual therapy can lead to legal ambiguities and potential risks when it comes to safeguarding client information.

Trust and Client Concerns

Lastly, the perception of privacy and security in virtual therapy can impact the therapeutic relationship itself. Trust is a cornerstone of the therapeutic process, and clients who are concerned about the privacy of their sessions may feel hesitant to fully engage or open up. The uncertainty around data security, technical issues, and platform reliability may create anxiety or discomfort, ultimately hindering the progress of therapy. Clients may also be less willing to share sensitive information if they believe their privacy is at risk.

Therapists can help alleviate these concerns by discussing privacy measures upfront, ensuring clients understand the security protocols in place, and taking steps to create a secure virtual environment. However, addressing these concerns openly and transparently is essential for building trust and fostering a safe therapeutic space.

Considerations for Choosing Between In-Person and Zoom Therapy

Comfort and Communication Style

Your personal communication style and comfort level are key factors in choosing between in-person and virtual therapy. If you are someone who values face-to-face interactions and relies heavily on non-verbal cues, in-person therapy may be the better option. Alternatively, if you are more comfortable in your own home and prefer the flexibility that online therapy provides, Zoom sessions could be a better fit.

Accessibility

For individuals with limited access to therapists in their geographic area or who face barriers to in-person attendance, Zoom therapy may be the only option. In areas where mental health services are scarce or expensive, virtual therapy can expand access to a wide range of professionals and therapeutic approaches.

Therapy Type and Goals

Certain therapeutic approaches may be more conducive to in-person sessions, particularly those that rely on physical presence, such as somatic therapy or trauma-focused therapy. For talk-based therapies, such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) or Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), Zoom therapy can be just as effective.

Conclusion

The choice between in-person and Zoom therapy ultimately depends on your individual needs, preferences, and circumstances. In-person therapy offers a stronger sense of connection, emotional support, and the benefits of physical presence, but it can also be less accessible and less convenient for some individuals. Zoom therapy, on the other hand, provides greater flexibility, affordability, and accessibility, but may lack the depth of personal connection that in-person therapy provides.

Both methods have their advantages and limitations, and neither is inherently superior to the other. The most important factor is that therapy, in whatever form it takes, is a valuable resource for mental health and well-being. With both in-person and Zoom therapy proving effective for different individuals, the most important thing is to find what works best for you.

Dr. Randi Fredricks, Ph.D.

Author Bio

Dr. Randi Fredricks is a leading expert in the field of mental health counseling and psychotherapy, with over three decades of experience in both research and practice. She holds a PhD from The Institute of Transpersonal Psychology and has published ground-breaking research on communication, mental health, and complementary and alternative medicine. Dr. Fredricks is a best-selling author of books on the treatment of mental health conditions with complementary and alternative medicine. Her work has been featured in leading academic journals and is recognized worldwide. She currently is actively involved in developing innovative solutions for treating mental health. To learn more about Dr. Fredricks’ work, visit her website: https://drrandifredricks.com

References

American Psychological Association. (2020). Telehealth and the Future of Psychology. APA Digital Publishing.

Backhaus, A., Agha, Z., et al. (2012). Videoconferencing Psychotherapy: A Systematic Review. Telemedicine and e-Health, 18(6), 278-284.

Cavanagh, K., et al. (2018). Online Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 225, 221-229.

Day, R. M., et al. (2020). Telepsychology: Telehealth in Mental Health Practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76(8), 1523-1532.

Pashak, T. J., & Hughes, M. E. (2019). In-Person versus Online Therapy: A Comparative Study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(5), 641-651.

Racusin G. R., Abramowitz S. I., Winter W. D. (1981). Becoming a therapist: Family dynamics and career choice. Professional Psychology, 12(2), 271-279. https://psycnet.apa.org/ doi/10.1037/0735-7028.12.2.271 [Google Scholar]

Simionato G. K., Simpson S. (2018). Personal risk factors associated with burnout among psychotherapists: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of clinical psychology, 74(9), 1431-1456. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Skovholt T. M., Rønnestad M. H. (1992). The evolving professional self: Stages and themes in therapist and counselor development. Wiley [Google Scholar]

Skowrońska J. (2018). The psychotherapists’ relation with their own siblings as a factor shaping the therapeutic relation. In Campbell M. E. (Ed.) Siblings (pp. 261-272). Routledge. [Google Scholar]

Van Hoy A., Rzeszutek M. (2022). Burnout and psychological wellbeing among psychotherapists: a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 928191. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2 022.928191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Is It Better to See a Therapist In Person or on Zoom?